Page 1 of 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=444926)

BarnacleBob | 02-02-2010 03:23 PM
U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#more-359 The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns. The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms. Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference. The stakes couldn�t be higher. Former United Nation�s ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners about the Arms Trade Treaty and says the UN �is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there�s no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.� Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation. The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty� . . .and that�s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in. Once the UN Gun Ban is passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations it must be ratified by each nation, including the United States. As an arch enemy of gun owners, Clinton has pledged to push the U.S. Senate to ratify the treaty. She will push for passage of this outrageous treaty designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU. That�s why it�s vital you sign the special petition I�ve made up for your signature that DEMANDS your U.S. Senators vote AGAINST ratification of the UN�s �Small Arms Treaty.� So far, the gun-grabbers have successfully kept the exact wording of their new scheme under wraps. But looking at previous versions of the UN �Small Arms Treaty,� you and I can get a good idea of what�s likely in the works. Don�t let any of the �experts� lull you to sleep by saying �Oh, we have it handled� or �Until you know exactly what�s in the treaty you can�t fight against it.� Judging by Ambassador Bolton�s comments � who certainly knows what to expect from the American-freedom-hating international crowd that infests the U.N. � we are certain the treaty�s going to address the private ownership of firearms. If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate (which is where we must ultimately make our stand), the UN �Small Arms Treaty� would almost certainly FORCE national governments to: *** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally; *** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL �unauthorized� civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course); *** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons; *** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION. So please click here to sign the petition to your U.S. Senators before it�s too late! You see, this is NOT a fight we can afford to lose. Here�s what you can do to help the National Association for Gun Rights fight Hillary Clinton and her United Nations cronies: � Click here and sign our petition to DEMAND that your United States Senators vote AGAINST the United Nations Small Arms Treaty. � Forward this petition to your friends and relatives who share your concern for American sovereignty and protecting our right to keep and bear arms. � Please consider making a generous contribution to the National Association for Gun Rights to help us fight Hillary Clinton and the United Nations �Small Arms Treaty.�

phideaux | 02-02-2010 03:28 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban What part of "shall not be infringed" does Shillary not understand?... :banghead: ...All of it

Libertytree | 02-02-2010 03:39 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban While the topic is serious and I'm fully convinced that this probably in their minds as a plan, I kind of have to chuckle. Saying it and doing it are two entirely different things. If they want a full blown revolution then this is their opportunity. Let's party!

Big Country | 02-02-2010 03:45 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Agreed LibertyTree. I won't comply with an International traitory of anysort!

Libertytree | 02-02-2010 03:57 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban I won't comply with any American traitory either for that matter. These people are just way out of hand, not to mention their minds.

Patriotme | 02-02-2010 03:57 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban This treaty will not be ratified by the US Senate. There are not enough bed wetting liberals serving in the Senate to "Ram" this through. I doubt that even the Blue Dogs will get on board with this treaty.

phideaux | 02-02-2010 04:07 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban There are about 80 million gun owners in the US, each owning about 3 guns on average. Bring it on, UN.:36_1_30:

Absintheur | 02-02-2010 04:15 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban I agree that it won't pass ratification of the Senate but I can also see Obama trying to bypass the Senate on this. We need our elected representatives to stand up to him and his czars and take back the power we gave them when we voted for them.

mk3hunter | 02-02-2010 04:20 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban A shout out to the ones that might enforce this crap.....cause politicans will not wake up LEO's............ will you be a tool of the UN??? Do you really want to die at someones doorstep for the UN??? not to early to start thinking about what laws you are willing to die for....

greenbear | 02-02-2010 04:22 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by phideaux (Post 2159082) There are about 80 million gun owners in the US, each owning about 3 guns on average. Bring it on, UN.:36_1_30:
I kinda like hearing Bob Chapman warn the "Blue Hats" that if they come to US to enforce martial law or NWO agenda they will leave in body bags. I don't know if it's true, though. Look at what the monsters have accomplished so far with no action. Substantial number of foreign troops on American soil may change that, I don't know.

Twisted Avatar | 02-02-2010 04:24 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban 1 Attachment(s) NUFF SAID............

UncaScrooge | 02-02-2010 04:28 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to UN Gun Ban: I'M GIVING UP ALL MY GUNS!!! Since the UN has told the USA to roll over and have all citizens give up their guns... I will SUBMIT!!! IN FACT: I'm going to get a home equity loan to buy MORE guns so that I can turn MORE guns in. The Obama anti-American government is NEVER wrong! If the government says the Bill of Rights should be ignored... well, they certainly know better than I do! Now, where do I get in line to get my cup of Kool-Aid???

meatman | 02-02-2010 04:50 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban I laugh when this link always come up, congress could vote it in and it still would not matter. Folks are Constitution always comes before a UN treaty or any treaty thats what is so great about our country http://meatman.smugmug.com/Other/gun...14_9YaWY-M.jpg Look to see where these links are coming from pro gun websites they are putting more into it then it is. these sites have their own agenda to scare us. small arms between countries

UncaScrooge | 02-02-2010 04:53 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by meatman (Post 2159166) I laugh when this link always come up, congress could vote it in and it still would not matter. Folks are Constitution always comes before a UN treaty or any treaty thats what is so great about our country http://meatman.smugmug.com/Other/gun...14_9YaWY-M.jpg
Nice helmet! And air-conditioned, too! :beer:

JJ_ | 02-02-2010 04:53 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban If The Senate decides to ratify this - It may as well be at the foot of a gallows.

Haltiat | 02-02-2010 04:57 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by phideaux (Post 2159082) There are about 80 million gun owners in the US, each owning about 3 guns on average. Bring it on, UN.:36_1_30:
What makes it even worse for them is that Americans don't come in just one size or shape. We have many able bodied American marksmen of every ethnicity speaking every language. Our riflemen can blend into the local population of any foreign country and pick off the top asshats from 500 or 1,000 meters away. In a world full of stupid ideas bringing a war to the American people is the stupidest.

steyr_m | 02-02-2010 04:59 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban I do not see this going through. The POS that's roasting in Hell right now, T. Kennedy.... his seat went to a Republican. The writing is on the wall. People are getting pissed off...

Ruthless Defaulter | 02-02-2010 05:17 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban That's nice. Imposing another "law" contrary to rights is easy. Enforcing such "law" is not. Buy one of these, and start practicing, folks: http://www.buymilsurp.com/united-nat...t-p-40040.html

Twisted Avatar | 02-02-2010 05:18 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Haltiat (Post 2159178) What makes it even worse for them is that Americans don't come in just one size or shape. We have many able bodied American marksmen of every ethnicity speaking every language. Our riflemen can blend into the local population of any foreign country and pick off the top asshats from 500 or 1,000 meters away. In a world full of stupid ideas bringing a war to the American people is the stupidest.
A Mosin can reek absolute Havoc I got three :ok: http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles...hite-death-can

meatman | 02-02-2010 05:22 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Avatar (Post 2159220) A Mosin can reek absolute Havoc I got three :ok: http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles...hite-death-can
Mosin's reeks havoc on my F**kin shoulder

Haltiat | 02-02-2010 05:30 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Avatar (Post 2159220) A Mosin can reek absolute Havoc I got three :ok: http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles...hite-death-can
Good deal! Grab two buddies and practice volley fire from almost a mile away! You'd be shocked at the results you can get with just a little fundamental marksmanship.

voidus | 02-02-2010 05:37 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertytree (Post 2159047) While the topic is serious and I'm fully convinced that this probably in their minds as a plan, I kind of have to chuckle. Saying it and doing it are two entirely different things. If they want a full blown revolution then this is their opportunity. Let's party!
yep.... :RockOn:

wildcard | 02-02-2010 05:47 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w...molon-labe.jpg

Heimdhal | 02-02-2010 05:51 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Avatar (Post 2159220) A Mosin can reek absolute Havoc I got three :ok: http://snardfarker.ning.com/profiles...hite-death-can
TA, I've read a lot of stories and synop's about that guy...but that is one the farking funniest summaries I have ever seen! :111: "Cause hes the ****ing White Death, damnit!"

Ruthless Defaulter | 02-02-2010 05:57 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by meatman (Post 2159228) Mosin's reeks havoc on my F**kin shoulder
Wimp! (just kidding) Get yourself one of these: http://www.limbsaver.com/2010/produc...pads/index.php (Walmart usually carries a Winchester-branded version of the same item for less)

Big Country | 02-02-2010 06:56 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruthless Defaulter (Post 2159271) Wimp! (just kidding) Get yourself one of these: http://www.limbsaver.com/2010/produc...pads/index.php (Walmart usually carries a Winchester-branded version of the same item for less)
Come on now...My wife is 5'9" 150lbs (her pic is in my "new family member" thread ) and she has no problem shooting Mosins. She actually has two, an M91/30 (1934) and an M44 (1945) and she actually LIKES to shoot them. She normally wears a tshirt shooting and likes to shoot it about 20 times before moving on to another rifle. Me on the other hand have a giant bruise after about 5 shots, but it still doesn't hurt. Just bruised. Pull it in tight to your shoulder, lean forward, and hang on tight and it shouldn't hurt too much! Remember they were designed by the Russians who usually had a giant butt pad built into their clothing (aka a big thick parka!!!). I don't think they were designed to be shot with a tshirt! :-P

Twisted Avatar | 02-02-2010 08:16 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Heimdhal (Post 2159268) TA, I've read a lot of stories and synop's about that guy...but that is one the farking funniest summaries I have ever seen! :111: "Cause hes the ****ing White Death, damnit!"
I bust a gut every time Hemi T

Wilhelm | 02-02-2010 08:32 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Just laying the groundwork for the day the American people begs the UN to save them.......at their terms, and by the way here are all these UN resolutions that were passed years ago you guys signed off on.....

nickelless | 02-02-2010 08:44 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriotme (Post 2159072) This treaty will not be ratified by the US Senate. There are not enough bed wetting liberals serving in the Senate to "Ram" this through. I doubt that even the Blue Dogs will get on board with this treaty.
It'll take 2/3 of the Senate to ratify this. Not a snowball's chance now, even less after the mid-term elections.

Ghost | 02-02-2010 10:09 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Unless the Supreme Court stepped in an did one of their off the wall interpretations , I would think it would take a Amendment to the Constitution before the Senate could ratify that treaty. Ghost

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM. |
Page 1 of 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM

Gold & Silver Forum - U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban

Page 2 of 3 | < | 1 | 2 | 3 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=444926)

nickelless | 02-02-2010 10:44 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost (Post 2159614) Unless the Supreme Court stepped in an did one of their off the wall interpretations , I would think it would take a Amendment to the Constitution before the Senate could ratify that treaty. Ghost
Three words: D.C. versus Heller

GoldBuyer123 | 02-02-2010 11:12 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Bullshit!!!! For everybody here not full of it, prove it!!! 1+ hour from now (12PM EST) fire off a round into the air. Let the USA know you are serious. My guess, nothing, pure silence....

Zusn | 02-03-2010 12:07 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Country (Post 2159346) Me on the other hand have a giant bruise after about 5 shots, but it still doesn't hurt. Just bruised. Pull it in tight to your shoulder, lean forward, and hang on tight and it shouldn't hurt too much!
Try shooting it without leaning forward. Stand/sit more upright and let the recoil push your shoulder back. You'll get more that 5 shots out before bruising :emotions16:

Haltiat | 02-03-2010 12:18 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldBuyer123 (Post 2159709) Bullshit!!!! For everybody here not full of it, prove it!!! 1+ hour from now (12PM EST) fire off a round into the air. Let the USA know you are serious. My guess, nothing, pure silence....
That is a good idea for a protest. I have an even better one though, everybody buy another 1,000 rounds of ammo.

GB1980 | 02-03-2010 09:16 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants"....... Thomas Jefferson. Let the tree of Liberty be refreshed with the tyrants blood first.

eyeofliberty | 02-03-2010 12:33 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldBuyer123 (Post 2159709) Bullshit!!!! For everybody here not full of it, prove it!!! 1+ hour from now (12PM EST) fire off a round into the air. Let the USA know you are serious. My guess, nothing, pure silence....
Whatever, man. Falling bullets can kill innocents. Dumb idea. Just go to the freakin' range and practice, and skip the cheap theatrics. :stupid:

Ruthless Defaulter | 02-03-2010 12:49 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldBuyer123 (Post 2159709) Bullshit!!!! For everybody here not full of it, prove it!!! 1+ hour from now (12PM EST) fire off a round into the air. Let the USA know you are serious. My guess, nothing, pure silence....
http://i479.photobucket.com/albums/r...-the-troll.jpg

Twisted Avatar | 02-03-2010 01:55 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeofliberty (Post 2160488) Whatever, man. Falling bullets can kill innocents. Dumb idea. Just go to the freakin' range and practice, and skip the cheap theatrics. :stupid:
Stray Bullet Kills Boy Up To Three Miles Away http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wor...15513798?f=rss

jtmo3 | 02-03-2010 02:06 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost (Post 2159614) Unless the Supreme Court stepped in an did one of their off the wall interpretations , I would think it would take a Amendment to the Constitution before the Senate could ratify that treaty. Ghost
Not hardly. If a treaty is ratified, it trumps the constitution. If this treaty were ratified, the second amendment would be null and void.

AurumAg | 02-03-2010 03:24 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Establishing the dates for the Arms Trade Treaty Conference is just the first step toward their plans for total gun confiscation. The worldwide gun control mob will ensure the passage of an egregious, anti-gun treaty� . . .and that�s where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton steps in. Correction: This is the point at which Madame Secretary steps down. This "timetable" should be the countdown for sovereign Americans to finally, conclusively and undeniably REMOVE the UN headquarters from American soil (that assumes of course that NY is part of America, and some debate ensues). My plan for UN removal: Fire alarms are triggered. Evacuation of all UN personnel. UN "ambassadors" are each provided with a one-way ticket to the nation of origin, paid for by Rockefeller of course. UN employees of U.S. origin are sent to Haiti for a minimum 7 year latrine-duty station, or they can simply resign. Building evacuation is confirmed, and the buildings are "pulled" in the same, safe manner as WTC Bldg 7. A "never again" memorial is erected on the site of the UN HQ, also paid for by Rockefeller. As for any shooting in the air, celebratory or otherwise, I will quote Rahm Emmanuel: That's f*cking retarded!

mk3hunter | 02-03-2010 03:35 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban who is John Ross?

JJ_ | 02-03-2010 03:40 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban 1 Attachment(s) Quote:
Originally Posted by mk3hunter (Post 2160834) who is John Ross?
Attachment 86674 He wrote this.

eyeofliberty | 02-03-2010 03:47 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by mk3hunter (Post 2160834) who is John Ross?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ_ (Post 2160842) He wrote this.
I could be wrong, but I think it was a rhetorical question.

jetgraphics | 02-03-2010 03:48 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Do not dismiss treaties as a means to an end. Socialist InSecurity was sanitized by an international totalization agreement. (If you didn't know it, you had better realize that 'your number' identifies you in an international compact - which cannot be impaired BY LAW.) 42 USC Sec. 433. International agreements (a) Purpose of agreement The President is authorized (subject to the succeeding provisions of this section) to enter into agreements establishing totalization arrangements between the social security system established by this subchapter and the social security system of any foreign country... You may have been endowed by your Creator with inalienable rights to life, liberty and property ownership, but that doesn't mean you still have them after unwittingly surrendering them for "benefits". Mister Ignorance lives in every American household, and he is hard to root out.

JJ_ | 02-03-2010 03:52 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeofliberty (Post 2160850) I could be wrong, but I think it was a rhetorical question.
DAMN! I thought we were playing trivia!:banana:

Twisted Avatar | 02-03-2010 03:58 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by jtmo3 (Post 2160674) Not hardly. If a treaty is ratified, it trumps the constitution. If this treaty were ratified, the second amendment would be null and void.
Well thank God well armed Americans dont have to adhere to such draconian measures. T

eyeofliberty | 02-03-2010 04:25 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ_ (Post 2160864) DAMN! I thought we were playing trivia!:banana:
Heh, I had to go through the entire thread to see if someone mentioned John Ross in another post. How anal was that? :biggrin: Great book, though. I should read it again. Kept me riveted the first time through.

45 ACP | 02-03-2010 04:42 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by jtmo3 (Post 2160674) Not hardly. If a treaty is ratified, it trumps the constitution. If this treaty were ratified, the second amendment would be null and void.
Sorry, but no treaty can take away God given rights. If the treaty were to pass and the second amendment was suspended, then the traitors who passed it would be null and void.

45 ACP | 02-03-2010 04:46 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics (Post 2160853) You may have been endowed by your Creator with inalienable rights to life, liberty and property ownership, but that doesn't mean you still have them after unwittingly surrendering them for "benefits". Mister Ignorance lives in every American household, and he is hard to root out.
We retain the rights if we choose to exercise them. And if that means dissolving political bands, so be it. When in the course of human events...

wallew | 02-03-2010 06:00 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban See, I don't get this. It WON'T be put to Senate vote. It WILL be ratified as an Executive Order. COMPLETELY ILLEGAL, but hey, why let a little thing like 'THE CONSTITUTION' stand in your way. They haven't yet. And for this to 'fly', this turd has to 'fly' BEFORE the November elections. I've been saying for a long time that we may NEVER get to have another election. One 'event' and martial law is already stacked up and waiting like a swat team stacked outside a crack dealers house. And excuse me, but BHO was the original sponsor of Senate Bill 2433. Guess who was the FIRST co-sponsor? Joe Biden. This is NOT the first time I've brought it up. Here is what it said: The United States Senate Bill 2433 is what could amount to an $845 BILLION United Nations style global tax on American citizens? It's called the Global Poverty Act (SB 2433), and it is being sponsored by none other than Senator Barack Obama. According to some conservative sources, this disastrous legislation could eventually force U.S. taxpayers to fork over as much as 0.7 percent of the nation's Gross Domestic Product -- or $845,000,000,000.00 -- on welfare to third-world countries. The Global Poverty Act intentionally gives no specific figures but it does contain clues, and those clues are stated repeatedly in the legislation's reliance on the United Nations Millennium Development Goal. "The bill defines the term 'Millennium Development Goals' as the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration..." "In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child." "Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims." "The legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years... would amount to $845 billion 'over and above what the U.S. already spends.'" "The plan passed the House in 2007 'because most members didn't realize what was in it.' Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require." And, how would the United States pay for this $845 BILLION commitment? According to Kincaid, who published a report on the legislation; "A global tax will clearly be necessary to force American taxpayers to provide the money." And that $845 BILLION global tax is in addition to our nation's current Foreign Aid programs, which, in 2006, cost American taxpayers about $300 BILLION! As you can see, this was when 800 billion dollars actually meant something. This was when 'Global Warming' was actually believed by some (some still do). Please realize it's already passed the House. So, passing the Senate would be a breeze, if done in complete secrecy. Which could happen. Illegal of course, but hey, why worry about the Constitution. Then all hell breaks loose and the fed.gov is FORCED to clamp down. With the help of UN troops (are they still here?) already on our soil for training exercises. This is of course, completely coincidental you know. BOHICA

Twisted Avatar | 02-03-2010 06:10 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban GUN BUYING FRENZY V2.0 IS COMMING. BEAT THE RUSH. T

Justabear | 02-03-2010 09:19 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban YES, Frenzy 2.0 is coming. If you need anything, now is the time to buy, prices are down and supply is up.

mick silver | 02-03-2010 09:30 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriotme (Post 2159072) This treaty will not be ratified by the US Senate. There are not enough bed wetting liberals serving in the Senate to "Ram" this through. I doubt that even the Blue Dogs will get on board with this treaty.
in the last couple of years i have learn never to say never ......... theys people are not there to work for me an you

Twisted Avatar | 02-03-2010 09:51 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by Justabear (Post 2161363) YES, Frenzy 2.0 is coming. If you need anything, now is the time to buy, prices are down and supply is up.
In the hunt for some Glock 30's this month Anybody got a recomend on a Ammo retailer??? T

mk3hunter | 02-04-2010 09:16 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
who is John Ross?
sorry guys....it was a rhetorical question. (Book not on amazon anymore....still on http://www.accuratepress.net Nation of cowards book.......floored me..just floored me when I first read it.

Twisted Avatar | 02-04-2010 09:18 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by mk3hunter (Post 2162006) sorry guys....it was a rhetorical question. (Book not on amazon anymore....still on http://www.accuratepress.net/contact.html
Did they pull it or something?? T

Horn | 02-04-2010 09:26 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban I'll bet they figure they can starve at least 6 mil. of those 8mil. away from their equip.

FiftySense | 02-06-2010 02:57 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Their law means nothing to me. Their money I only use to prepare my independence. Their breath will cease when the rest of my brothers and sisters follow suit.

harper | 02-06-2010 03:18 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban strange that any reference to the text of this agreement or dating/reference to bolton's "statement" is not listed.... sounds like BS, though I bet the libs would like it to be true.

Unclad Lad | 02-06-2010 03:37 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Someone needs to write an extra letter for me--my Senators are Boxer and Feinstein.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM. |
Page 2 of 3 | < | 1 | 2 | 3 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM

Gold & Silver Forum - U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban

Page 3 of 3 | < | 1 | 2 | 3
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=444926)

nickelless | 02-07-2010 12:11 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by jtmo3 (Post 2160674) Not hardly. If a treaty is ratified, it trumps the constitution. If this treaty were ratified, the second amendment would be null and void.
If the U.S. government didn't honor treaties it made with Native Americans, why should the U.S. people honor a treaty our so-called leaders try to make with the U.N.?

Twisted Avatar | 02-07-2010 01:10 AM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Quote:
Originally Posted by nickelless (Post 2166671) If the U.S. government didn't honor treaties it made with Native Americans, why should the U.S. people honor a treaty our so-called leaders try to make with the U.N.?
Exactly Yet people have a extremley hard challenge grasping that simple concept THE LAWS ARE THEIR TO SCREW YOU T

Horn | 02-07-2010 02:45 PM
Re: U.S. agrees to timetable for UN Gun Ban Stealthily the bankers move towards the bunkers, while their plans to disappear untouched steadily progress unhindered.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM. |
Page 3 of 3 | < | 1 | 2 | 3
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM