Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=451087)

eyeofliberty | 02-25-2010 07:56 AM
Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? http://www.examiner.com/x-1417-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m2d24-Why-does-Sting-promote-antigun-sentiments-that-enable-tyranny?cid=exrss-Gun-Rights-Examiner By performing for up to a �2million payday from an event to honor a tyrant's "daughter and anointed heir," the musician Sting has once more shown us he's not above enriching himself at the expense of the masses�while still presenting himself as a human rights champion. From the Daily Mail: Sting has been labelled 'a hypocrite' after playing at a concert in Uzbekistan organised by the brutal regime of Islam Karimov. Enemies of the 72-year-old dictator have been shot in the street and a former British ambassador to the ex-Soviet state even accused him of boiling alive his political opponents. "Shot in the street"? But what happened to this sentiment I criticized the singer for back in 2003? Use your imagination and imagine a world without guns. As I noted then, if we are to cede to Sting's imagination, we must first: * Imagine Armenians living in Ottoman Turkey without guns. * Imagine the oppressed in Stalin�s Soviet Union without guns. * Imagine Jews in Nazi Germany and conquered Europe without guns. * Imagine the Chinese casualties of Chairman Mao�s terror without guns. * Imagine Pol Pot�s Cambodian �killing fields� victims without guns. * Now imagine the same genocidal scenario playing out in Guatemala, Uganda, Rwanda� Heck, why don't we just imagine Uzbekistanis living under the heel of Sting's patron state without guns? Here's more anti-gun sentiment from the great globalist humanitarian: I hate this f*****g Stallone s**t, I can't bear it. I hate seeing actors with guns - there they are on every movie poster, looking like complete d**kheads. I've been offered those movies and I won't do them. There's a scene in 'Stormy Monday' (the film he completed in Newcastle last summer with Tommy Lee Jones and Melanie Griffith) involving a gun and I wouldn't do it unless my character were allowed to say how much he hated them. But only if the guns are in private hands, it would seem, because we don't see him challenging the monopoly of power held by his benefactor state (nor, incidentally, do we see that wretched hypocrite Stallone). And by imagining the world as Sting would have us imagine it, we see this: Photographic evidence examined by The Times shows Uzbek soldiers crouching for cover alongside armoured Land Rover Defenders as they pointed guns at unarmed demonstrators in Andijan on May 13 � when up to 500 men, women and children were shot dead. Meanwhile, in a nation where "45% of the population live on less than US $1.25 per day," it's nice to know the enablers/beneficiaries of the tyrannical regime can pony up "�1,400 - 45 times the average local monthly salary" so that Sting can continue to live the lifestyle of the super-rich globalists. But that's OK, because we're told: The concert was organized by the president�s daughter and I believe sponsored by Unicef. You know, the same Unicef that makes global disarmament of "non state actors" such a priority... He "believes"? He doesn't know? And none of the proceeds went to the regime, to help them continue the tyranny? And we're supposed to believe that? But hey, that's OK, too, because: 'I have come to believe that cultural boycotts are not only pointless gestures, they are counter-productive... Typically Orwellian. But yeah, I can see where Sting's version would be counter-productive�to him. And I guess we wouldn't want to rob the culture-starved world of his enlightened influence... Good grief. I note a typical construct used by journalists is to refer to this champion of the masses as "the former Police frontman." It appears we could change that to "current" and add the word "state."

hoarder | 02-25-2010 08:28 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? It's pretty simple. Gun control is the Jewish agenda; the leading gun control politicians are almost all Jews. Waxman, Feinstein, Metzenbaum, Cellar, Schumer Lautenberg. Musicians work for Hollywood, unless they want to make a living scratching for nickels in local bars. Uno hoo controls Hollywood. Bands need agents. Almost all the agents are Jews. If you hired a goy agent what could he do when he goes to Hollywood? Nothing. That's why you hire a Jew. Most musicians are only performers, others write their songs. Who do you think these songwriters are? Jewish songwriters write what they want the goyim to hear over and over again. So it works like this; A subversive songwriter supplies the song, the agent says "This is a great song! It will really sell!" The band sings it. Guess who owns all the radio stations? Yes, the radio stations play the songs over and over because they know repetition makes people like sorry songs more. It works, it sells, the agent says "I told you so, just trust me".

Ragnarok | 02-25-2010 10:47 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Because his belief that it would be nice to live in a perfect world exceeds the reality. A common affliction imo. R.

Twisted Avatar | 02-25-2010 11:43 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragnarok (Post 2198318) Because his belief that it would be nice to live in a perfect world exceeds the reality. A common affliction imo. R.
Aww Come on Rag...... Man is just sending The Love. You Tube
You Tube

gunDriller | 02-25-2010 12:23 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeofliberty (Post 2198080) Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny?
because he's an idiot. that's just a guess. bancha in other words, i'm just guessing. :ARMS1:

Irons | 02-25-2010 12:29 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? 1 Attachment(s) Because he's an asshat and always has been. All Mr Sting needs to find love is a mirror. Attachment 87811

eyeofliberty | 02-25-2010 12:31 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by Irons (Post 2198499) All Mr Sting needs to find love is a mirror.
Indeed. The man has an ego the size of Texas.

FoundingFathers | 02-25-2010 12:34 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Maybe he's back with the Police.

mick silver | 02-25-2010 12:38 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? because in there world they hire people who carry a gun for them ... it all about what most rich ass holes want ... you dont need that many rolls of toilet paper . you dont need a car ... you dont need what i have and you should not have that right to have what i have it all for me me me ... it make me sick seeing someone pushing there crap on me , hell you go and see a show there someone there alway trying to push stuff on the people there .... leave me alone and i will do the same

eyeofliberty | 02-25-2010 12:42 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by mick silver (Post 2198515) because in there world they hire people who carry a gun for them ... it all about what most rich ass holes want ... you dont need that many rolls of toilet paper . you dont need a car ... you dont need what i have and you should not have that right to have what i have it all for me me me ... it make me sick seeing someone pushing there crap on me , hell you go and see a show there someone there alway trying to push stuff on the people there .... leave me alone and i will do the same
Yeah, just like the rich celebrities that fawn all over Castro and Cuba. Hey, your job and lifestyle wouldn't exist there, dumbasses! How about you give it all up and move there?

Raven | 02-25-2010 01:28 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? He is O.K. with knives though. See the movie Dune. Knives must be O.K.

TomD | 02-25-2010 01:41 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Why would anyone think that an actor or musician automatically has a more informed or intelligent opinion that any other randomly selected asshole? Do we eagerly seek out NFL corner backs for medical information? It makes precisely as much sense.

Tantris | 02-25-2010 04:26 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? :signs14:Its simple,,,, he's an a$$hole,,,,,,but I could be wrong.

Publico, Pro Se | 02-25-2010 04:34 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Somebody should get an interview with him. Ask him about gun control then ask him if his security detail has guns, and if so why? And if not, point out every Tom, Dick or Harry with mal-intent will know about his defenselessness.

Silver Sayyid | 02-25-2010 04:38 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Famous for his music, does not equal intellect, soul or wisdom. It just means he can make music. His opinion, because it is heard by more does not make it better.

Apocalypto | 02-25-2010 04:57 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Sting's a prick. The only thing he's good at is singing "Eeyooo... Eeyooo..." over and over. Totally over-rated idiot. Sting's view blocked... waaa waaa big baby Sting gets stung by karma in planning row

Osprey550 | 02-25-2010 05:46 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Because he's an asshat and always has been.
Absolutely correct! I never liked him or his friggin music anyway.

45 ACP | 02-27-2010 04:01 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Gun fag. But he has some cool songs.

General of Darkness | 02-27-2010 01:30 PM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Actually this statement isn't IMAGINATION, this currently is FACT. Their removal will however will require guns. * Imagine Jews in Nazi Germany and conquered Europe without guns.

electric-amish | 03-01-2010 08:09 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? He used to be favorite of mine. As God became a bigger part of my life I began to pay attention to lyrics of songs a lot more. Hes a Spiritual Mess and as such is willingly leading others in life threatening error. Globalist, Eliteist, Anti-Christian, Rebellious, Humanist, with Western misconcieved ideas of Budism. Of course hes wrong on matters of Life and Freedom. E-A

shades2 | 03-01-2010 08:55 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Great artist Sting, and just like U2. Should steer clear of politics. I dislike the fact artists get more say than other people, because the media listen to and publish their rantings. They should give up being preachy and actually contribute something without asking for kudos and adoration at every turn. Guns do not kill people, people do, and criminals can always get the guns no sweat. Any cop will admit that fact even if they don't like it. Law abiding people (the vast majority of people on the planet) don't generally commit crimes, and that includes gun crimes. That is the reality, it has always been the reality. Guns are not evil, they are a tool like a DeWalt hammer drill. Treat them with respect, don't abuse them, maintain them, and use them wisely.

Twisted Avatar | 03-01-2010 11:19 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by shades2 (Post 2204619) Great artist Sting, and just like U2. Should steer clear of politics.
U2 (Bono in Particular) is the music arm of the NWO He makes it seem "hip" to submit to the agenda of the one worlders He was all over the Place when the Dems swept into Power back in 08 Hearing much from him now??? T

shades2 | 03-02-2010 10:59 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Avatar (Post 2204804) U2 (Bono in Particular) is the music arm of the NWO He makes it seem "hip" to submit to the agenda of the one worlders He was all over the Place when the Dems swept into Power back in 08 Hearing much from him now??? T
Bono has gone very quiet... A lot of the hardcore Democrats are kind of regretting the new (old) Administration as they can see they were sold a fantasy. Democrats don't like being lied to, they prefer to tell the lies themselves. These are the kind of people that start crying in Avatar-3D, when we're joking about how much IKEA furniture the newly felled massive tree could make. :)

DrillAndFill | 03-02-2010 11:07 AM
Re: Why does Sting promote anti-gun sentiments that enable tyranny? He knows that a boycott won't hurt him, because nobody listens to his music any more. [Ducks...]

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM. |

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM