Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - Assault Weapons Ban II (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=322436)

SilverCity | 11-14-2008 11:15 PM
Assault Weapons Ban II In case anyone hasn't read the text of HR-1022 AWB II. This is the one McCarthy of New York came up with last year. I don't know what Mr. Obama & Co. will try to force upon us, but this might give you some idea. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h110-1022

smullen | 11-14-2008 11:36 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverCity (Post 1416945) In case anyone hasn't read the text of HR-1022 AWB II. This is the one McCarthy of New York came up with last year. I don't know what Mr. Obama & Co. will try to force upon us, but this might give you some idea. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h110-1022
Reading that, things don't look good... However, Thanks for the link... I went and created and account and setup a ""Tracker"" to let me know about anything new reguarding firearms bills...

StrawMan=Corporation | 11-14-2008 11:38 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Note the part in red below and here. Hopefully its dead in the water, but the bad thing is there are many others that have been introduced by the scum suckers that call themselves our representatives. Last Action:Mar 19, 2007: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. TRACK RESEARCH Get Involved About GovTrack Bill Search: click here for information about the paid content on GovTrack http://www.govtrack.us/media/email.gif Email http://www.govtrack.us/media/printer.gif Print Congress > Legislation > 2007-2008 (110th Congress) H.R. 1022: Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007 To reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes. Navigationhttp://www.govtrack.us/media/whwblk.gif Overview http://www.govtrack.us/media/bluedarksquare.gif Summary (CRS) http://www.govtrack.us/media/bluedarksquare.gif Full Text http://www.govtrack.us/media/bluedarksquare.gif Related Bills http://www.govtrack.us/media/bluedarksquare.gif Analysis Track H.R. 1022http://www.govtrack.us/media/feed-icon-20x20.gifThe feed for this bill includes all major activity on this bill, activity on amendments, references in the Congressional Record, and relevant upcoming committee meetings. Preview Feed Personalize GovTrack by selecting trackers. Tracking H.R. 1022 adds relevant events as they happen to your personal Tracked Events page. You are not logged in to an account. Log In | Sign Up (for free) Why sign up?When you sign up, your trackers are stored permanently and you can access them from any computer. Otherwise they are stored in a "cookie" on your computer and could get erased. When you are signed in, your personal tracked events RSS feed will update with your tracker settings, and you can get email updates on tracked events sent to you automatically. Make a widget for this tracker to display on your web page. Put the status of this bill on your own web page using a widget. Primary Sourcehttp://www.govtrack.us/media/info.gifSee H.R. 1022 on THOMAS for the official source of information on this bill. What is a House Bill (H.R.)?http://www.govtrack.us/media/help.gifA bill must be passed by both the House and Senate and then be signed by the President before it becomes law. See also: How a bill becomes a law from Project Vote Smart. Overview Sponsor:Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY]show cosponsors (67) Cosponsors [as of 2008-11-06] Rep. Edward Markey [D-MA] Rep. Bob Filner [D-CA] Rep. Bradley Miller [D-NC] Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee [D-TX] Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D-OH] Rep. Jerrold Nadler [D-NY] Rep. James McGovern [D-MA] Rep. John Tierney [D-MA] Rep. Raul Grijalva [D-AZ] Rep. Yvette Clarke [D-NY] Rep. William Delahunt [D-MA] Rep. Nita Lowey [D-NY] Del. Eleanor Norton [D-DC] Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D-FL] Rep. Robert Wexler [D-FL] Rep. Sam Farr [D-CA] Rep. Alcee Hastings [D-FL] Rep. Melvin Watt [D-NC] Rep. Allyson Schwartz [D-PA] Rep. Adam Schiff [D-CA] Rep. Anna Eshoo [D-CA] Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY] Rep. Diane Watson [D-CA] Rep. Diana DeGette [D-CO] Rep. Ellen Tauscher [D-CA] Rep. Hilda Solis [D-CA] Rep. Rush Holt [D-NJ] Rep. Chaka Fattah [D-PA] Rep. Zoe Lofgren [D-CA] Rep. Doris Matsui [D-CA] Rep. James Langevin [D-RI] Rep. Henry Johnson [D-GA] Rep. Neil Abercrombie [D-HI] Rep. Joseph Crowley [D-NY] Rep. Kendrick Meek [D-FL] Rep. Betty McCollum [D-MN] Rep. Jane Harman [D-CA] Rep. Lynn Woolsey [D-CA] Rep. Steven Rothman [D-NJ] Rep. Barbara Lee [D-CA] Rep. Barney Frank [D-MA] Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D-NY] Rep. Louise Slaughter [D-NY] Rep. Joe Sestak [D-PA] Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D-IL] Rep. Martin Meehan [D-MA] Rep. Rahm Emanuel [D-IL] Rep. William Clay [D-MO] Rep. Mazie Hirono [D-HI] Rep. Christopher Van Hollen [D-MD] Rep. Niki Tsongas [D-MA] Rep. Albio Sires [D-NJ] Rep. David Price [D-NC] Rep. Brad Sherman [D-CA] Rep. Michael Honda [D-CA] Rep. Robert Brady [D-PA] Rep. James Moran [D-VA] Rep. Edward Pastor [D-AZ] Rep. Earl Blumenauer [D-OR] Rep. Albert Wynn [D-MD] Rep. Patrick Kennedy [D-RI] Rep. Howard Berman [D-CA] Rep. John Olver [D-MA] Rep. Lois Capps [D-CA] Rep. Henry Waxman [D-CA] Rep. William Pascrell [D-NJ] Rep. Patrick Murphy [D-PA] Cosponsorship information sometimes is out of date. Why? Bill Text:Summary | Full TextStatus:http://www.govtrack.us/media/checkmark.gifIntroducedFeb 13, 2007http://www.govtrack.us/media/box.gifReported by Committee-http://www.govtrack.us/media/box.gifVoted on in House-http://www.govtrack.us/media/box.gifVoted on in Senate-http://www.govtrack.us/media/box.gifSigned by President-This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills go first to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills never make it out of committee. Keep in mind that sometimes the text of one bill is incorporated into another bill, and in those cases the original bill, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned. [Last Updated: Nov 6, 2008] Last Action:Mar 19, 2007: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.Question & Answer http://www.govtrack.us/media/questions.gif Can you answer any of these questions posed by other users? Think of it as a civic good deed. See 3 more questions posed on this topic or submit your own question on the Q&A page. (If you have a general question about how Congress works, see this page instead.) Enter your question. Tips: Be clear and precise. No abbreviations. Don't ask about the status of this bill or when it will be voted on (other users are not likely to know). Don't ask a loaded question or for individual advice: Your question will be rejected. After submitting your question it will be reviewed, and if approved will appear here. Nov 12, 2008 8:38 PM - Is this bill constitutional under D.C. vs. Heller? - Answer it! Add another answer. Answer This Question Tips: Reference the text of the bill when possible --- answers with unsourced facts may be rejected. Don't be inflammatory --- it will be edited out! Don't use abbreviations, but stay concise and on-point. Nov 12, 2008 9:28 PM - Citizens will be able to keep the so called assualt weapons if they legally owned them prior to the ban wont they? If so would they be able to sell them. - Answer it! Add another answer. Answer This Question Tips: Reference the text of the bill when possible --- answers with unsourced facts may be rejected. Don't be inflammatory --- it will be edited out! Don't use abbreviations, but stay concise and on-point. and 3 more questions. Articles About This Bill No articles are associated with this bill. You can suggest an article for inclusion here. Paste the web address (URL) of an article from a well-established publication below. Only thoughtful news articles from established publications will be accepted. All submissions are approved by a moderator before appearing on this page. To cite this information, we recommend the following: GovTrack.us. H.R. 1022--110th Congress (2007): Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2007, GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation) <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1022> (accessed Nov 14, 2008) Because the U.S. Congress posts most legislative information online one legislative day after events occur, GovTrack is usually one legislative day behind. GovTrack.us is not affiliated with the U.S. government or any other group. It is a pet project of a regular joe. (More About GovTrack) / Feedback (but not political opining) is welcome to [sorry, address shown only in JavaScript-enabled browsers]operations@govtrack.us, but I can't do your research for you, nor can I pass on messages to Members of Congress. Developers: GovTrack is open source and supports open knowledge. Get involved in civics! This site is "copyleft". You are encouraged to reuse any material on this site. http://m.okfn.org/images/ok_buttons/ok_80x23_blue.png http://opensource.org/trademarks/open_source_button.png click here for information about the paid content on GovTrack

shortstack | 11-15-2008 12:01 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II I did not see the M1a (Springfield) or the M14 on that list. Why would that be? I may plop down 3k on an LRB M-14 in January. I would rather have a grandfathered in "illegal" weapon that would be worth 10x what I paid for it. Course i would only accept AU or AG on that trade.

ohioarmedneutrality | 11-15-2008 12:04 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Dont' forget this one: H.R.6257 Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110pgTEOd::

johnlvs2run | 11-15-2008 12:07 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Is that an underground home in your avatar? Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1416960) Hopefully its dead in the water, but the bad thing is there are many others that have been introduced by the scum suckers that call themselves our representatives.
Anything banned for the citizens, should also be banned to them, the military and anyone else.

StrawMan=Corporation | 11-15-2008 01:53 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II 5 Attachment(s) Just the entrance to my garage and basement. 50 ft or so sub grade the rest of the house is still 5ft below grade. I dont mean to be a tease but this is the most anyone on the net has seen of my "Retreat" Can you spot my place amongst the trees ?. Quote:
Originally Posted by johnlvs2run (Post 1416981) Is that an underground home in your avatar? Anything banned for the citizens, should also be banned to them, the military and anyone else.

Bogie | 11-15-2008 05:15 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Carolyn McCarthy is a retard here is video of her discussing this ban and being asked about barrel shrouds YouTube Link
YouTube Link
" I don't Know what it is, I believe it's the shoulder thing that goes up" :banghead: They write these bills and don't even know what there banning.

Little Ant | 11-15-2008 05:45 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioarmedneutrality (Post 1416978) Dont' forget this one: H.R.6257 Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110pgTEOd::
This one is more recent (last action July 08) and look at the sponsors, all Republican traitors.:s15: I was going to paste the list of banned weapons but it was soooo long. Click this link http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h110-6257 and scroll down to see for yourself. H.R. 6257: Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act. Overview Sponsor: Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]hide cosponsors Cosponsors [as of 2008-11-07] Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R-FL] Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ] Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT] Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE] Status: Introduced Jun 12, 2008 Reported by Committee - Voted on in House - Voted on in Senate - Signed by President - Last Action: Jul 28, 2008: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

Twisted Avatar | 11-15-2008 07:24 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II They are Determined to take them. We are determined to keep them. How a revolution is avoided I don't dam know. T

ohioarmedneutrality | 11-15-2008 07:50 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Ant (Post 1417180) This one is more recent (last action July 08) and look at the sponsors, all Republican traitors.:s15: I was going to paste the list of banned weapons but it was soooo long. Click this link http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h110-6257 and scroll down to see for yourself. H.R. 6257: Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 To reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act. Overview Sponsor: Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]hide cosponsors Cosponsors [as of 2008-11-07] Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R-FL] Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ] Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT] Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE] Status: Introduced Jun 12, 2008 Reported by Committee - Voted on in House - Voted on in Senate - Signed by President - Last Action: Jul 28, 2008: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
I believe the token GOPer Shays lost his seat, did he not? If so, good.

Hi Ho | 11-15-2008 08:04 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1417074) Just the entrance to my garage and basement. 50 ft or so sub grade the rest of the house is still 5ft below grade. I dont mean to be a tease but this is the most anyone on the net has seen of my "Retreat" Can you spot my place amongst the trees ?.
You got a stargate in there? I'm envious. looking for a like minded neighbor?

Hi Ho | 11-15-2008 08:13 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioarmedneutrality (Post 1417210) I believe the token GOPer Shays lost his seat, did he not? If so, good.
Good riddance, he was Republican in name only. His people just stopped voting for him and the rest wanted the real thing.

Agamemnon | 11-15-2008 10:54 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1417074) Just the entrance to my garage and basement. 50 ft or so sub grade the rest of the house is still 5ft below grade. I dont mean to be a tease but this is the most anyone on the net has seen of my "Retreat" Can you spot my place amongst the trees ?.
GPS coordinates, recorded with 'lock on' solution .... T.I.A. internal terrorism threat level, nominal ... Thank you for your cooperation. .

Big_Rob | 11-15-2008 11:42 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II All this means is that that new stimulus check we might or might not be getting should go to buying guns and ammo.

Twisted Avatar | 11-15-2008 12:24 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Rob (Post 1417446) All this means is that that new stimulus check we might or might not be getting should go to buying guns and ammo.
DING!! DING!!! DING!! Use there money to arms yourself to the fricken teeth. I had to wait over two and a half hours today for my NICS check before I got my 12 guage. NOBODY with a lick of dam sense is leaving this to chance. T

flying | 11-15-2008 04:43 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1417074) Just the entrance to my garage and basement. 50 ft or so sub grade the rest of the house is still 5ft below grade. I dont mean to be a tease but this is the most anyone on the net has seen of my "Retreat" Can you spot my place amongst the trees ?.
I see a couple but I must say that is a beautiful area! Your a lucky man

madfranks | 11-15-2008 05:46 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by ohioarmedneutrality (Post 1416978) Dont' forget this one: H.R.6257 Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/.../~c110pgTEOd::
And it defines a high capacity magazine as one which can hold more than 10 rounds. 10 rounds is high capacity?!? Geez...

flying | 11-15-2008 05:48 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by madfranks (Post 1417820) And it defines a high capacity magazine as one which can hold more than 10 rounds. 10 rounds is high capacity?!? Geez...
Unfortunately that is what they call it here in our State where that is already law...........:confused_ma:

Silver Wolf | 11-15-2008 09:00 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Rob (Post 1417446) All this means is that that new stimulus check we might or might not be getting should go to buying guns and ammo.
:congrats: That would be great and exactly what I'll be doing. Waxman, Kucinich, Wexler, Ackerman, Woolsey, Emanuel, etc. The usual suspects....

johnlvs2run | 11-16-2008 01:20 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1417074) Just the entrance to my garage and basement. 50 ft or so sub grade the rest of the house is still 5ft below grade. I dont mean to be a tease but this is the most anyone on the net has seen of my "Retreat" Can you spot my place amongst the trees ?.
Since it's below grade... no... unless it's that long tunnel down the middle. No concerns about floods? Underground homes are amazing. You're a fortunate fellow. :-)

The Argent Dragon | 11-17-2008 02:51 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
`(37) Conversion Kit- The term `conversion kit' means any part or combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a firearm into a semiautomatic assault weapon, and any combination of parts from which a semiautomatic assault weapon can be assembled if the parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.
So, the way I read this, parts kits will go away too.

silver_addiction | 11-17-2008 03:18 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II buy em now and you will have nothing to worry about. buy about 1000 rounds too, and you will be set for life. get a mossberg 500 tactical, a remington 700 tactical in .308 and a couple glocks and you will be in good shape. while you're at it get 10 30 round clips for the ar-15, and 20 clips for the glocks, a bunch of shells for the mossberg and 1000 rounds for the remington 700.

Twisted Avatar | 11-17-2008 04:30 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by The Argent Dragon (Post 1420607) So, the way I read this, parts kits will go away too.
If they found out that toothpicks worked they would outlaw them as well. Nothing will please them until they are assured the public has been totally castrated. T

The Argent Dragon | 11-19-2008 12:08 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Avatar (Post 1420725) If they found out that toothpicks worked they would outlaw them as well.
Well, here's my toothpick ! ..........COME AND TAKE IT !!! :36_1_28: http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q.../DSCF01171.jpg

Twisted Avatar | 11-19-2008 05:53 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II HAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH Goood one AD. MOLON LABE!!! T

renegade_01 | 11-19-2008 09:07 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II The vampires will learn...soon as we "VOTE FROM THE ROOFTOP"

JJ_ | 11-19-2008 12:53 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II vote these guys out first. http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/...introduced.php Quote:
Define R.I.N.O.: A Republican In Name Only. Examples of the type of Republican covered under this definition are: Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL] Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R-FL] Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ] Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT] Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE] These five supposed Republican are nothing more than jackasses in elephant's clothing. Rep. Mark Kirk has introduced a bill, H.R. 6257: Assault Weapons Ban Reauthorization Act of 2008, which would "reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act." The bill has been co-sponsored by the other four jackasses listed above. All of them claim to be Republicans. All of them need to leave the party. Seriously. Go. We don't need your kind anymore. It is this kind of stuff that lost the Republican majority in Congress. No, not this particular issue, but the failure to adhere to Republican values in general. If you want to behave like a gun-grabbing Democrat, go sit on their side. It is better that the Republicans be in the minority, but true to conservative values than to be in the majority with no clear values at all. http://www.allamericanblogger.com/wp...ocrat250px.jpgThe problem with gun violence isn't that law abiding citizens have access to assault weapons (whatever that means.) It's that criminals use them to commit crimes. Read that last sentence. Commit crimes is the key part of that sentence. Having these guns be illegal will not limit the criminal's access to them. It will only make them better armed than their victims.

Abouthadit | 11-19-2008 04:32 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ ShortStroke (Post 1424255) vote these guys out first. http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/...introduced.php
and while you are at it, be sure to include the worthless POS Saxby Shameless, I mean Chambliss. Not that I am particularly happy to vote for a dim, the fact is that the incumbents need to be kicked out. Tell your GA friends to vote against the incumbent R GA senator on Dec 2.

<SLV> | 11-19-2008 04:49 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by madfranks (Post 1417820) And it defines a high capacity magazine as one which can hold more than 10 rounds. 10 rounds is high capacity?!? Geez...
I saw an interview with one of the directors of the NRA, and he said that it would be OK if they outlawed all semi-automatic rifles and limited magazine capacity to 3 rounds because, "No hunter should need more than 3 round to kill an animal."

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 | >
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM

Gold & Silver Forum - Assault Weapons Ban II

Page 2 of 2 | < | 1 | 2
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - Assault Weapons Ban II (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=322436)

Twisted Avatar | 11-19-2008 04:54 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by <SLV> (Post 1424771) I saw an interview with one of the directors of the NRA, and he said that it would be OK if they outlawed all semi-automatic rifles and limited magazine capacity to 3 rounds because, "No hunter should need more than 3 round to kill an animal."
And your are a DAM GOOD SHOT .........RIGHT??? How some people pay there salaries I will NEVER understand. T

Gold Rules | 11-19-2008 05:00 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by <SLV> (Post 1424771) I saw an interview with one of the directors of the NRA, and he said that it would be OK if they outlawed all semi-automatic rifles and limited magazine capacity to 3 rounds because, "No hunter should need more than 3 round to kill an animal."
There is the PERFECT reason NOT to be a member of the NRA ...........:36_1_28:

StrawMan=Corporation | 11-19-2008 05:05 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II I Posted that video on another board and received a NEG Rep point for it. My comment that accompanied the video link. Quote:
Who the F does this Sack of shit think he is to regulate our 2nd Amendment rights. This guy is just one example of the psychotic mentality of the supposed organisation that protects our gun rights. IMO they think its just about hunting. He talks about the 2nd and then speaks to regulate our rights. What a GD hypocrite.
You Tube
You Tube
Better version of it. You Tube
You Tube
Quote:
Originally Posted by <SLV> (Post 1424771) I saw an interview with one of the directors of the NRA, and he said that it would be OK if they outlawed all semi-automatic rifles and limited magazine capacity to 3 rounds because, "No hunter should need more than 3 round to kill an animal."

renegade_01 | 11-19-2008 05:31 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1424814) I Posted that video on another board and received a NEG Rep point for it. My comment that accompanied the video link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSGySNLyACE
HE will be Nick Burg one day....:sarc: I mean I'd rather be shot than sawed on..

The Argent Dragon | 11-19-2008 05:42 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by <SLV> (Post 1424771) "No hunter should need more than 3 round to kill an animal."
Well, I like to hunt Squirrel, and sometimes it takes a whole Belt of Ammo to tag one of those little bastards !!! http://www.tokyohobby.net/store/images/thmg42.jpg

mk3hunter | 11-19-2008 06:56 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II assault weapons ban will happen.........gunners dont have what it takes to stop it.

Twisted Avatar | 11-19-2008 07:05 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by mk3hunter (Post 1425052) assault weapons ban will happen.........gunners dont have what it takes to stop it.
We DONT have what it takes to stop the ban. But we DO have what it takes to stop the confiscation. T

The Argent Dragon | 11-19-2008 07:11 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by mk3hunter (Post 1425052) assault weapons ban will happen.........gunners dont have what it takes to stop it.
Keep in mind that a 'Ban' does not prohibit ownership.......it prohibits manufacture and assembly of NEW Assault Weapons as defined by the legislation that passes. With any luck, perhaps it'll be a bit more watered down and less harsh that currently written in Bill form. Now on confiscation, that's a whole 'nother topic for debate. :bear_tongue:

flying | 11-19-2008 07:13 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by The Argent Dragon (Post 1425090) Keep in mind that a 'Ban' does not prohibit ownership.......it prohibits manufacture and assembly of NEW Assault Weapons as defined by the legislation that passes. With any luck, perhaps it'll be a bit more watered down and less harsh that currently written in Bill form. Now on confiscation, that's a whole 'nother topic for debate. :bear_tongue:
That is true & a ban will have a expiration date like last time. Still it would be better to not have to go there.... Hopefully folks will speak up if only to contact their congressman or senator & say I am a voter & this is what I think of this.

The Argent Dragon | 11-19-2008 07:18 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II http://www.impactguns.com/store/media/tshirt_awb.JPG

flying | 11-19-2008 07:25 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by The Argent Dragon (Post 1425115) http://www.impactguns.com/store/media/tshirt_awb.JPG
:emotions16::applause_:applause_ LOL that is a great T I want one!

Twisted Avatar | 11-19-2008 07:49 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II 1 Attachment(s) Quote:
Originally Posted by flying (Post 1425099) Hopefully folks will speak up if only to contact their congressman or senator & say I am a voter & this is what I think of this.
Come again???

cugir321 | 11-19-2008 10:55 PM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II I talked to a regional NRA Rep about this video. There's more to this story then what you see on the utube video. 99.9% of the NRA members believe high cap mags are part of the second amendment. Remember this is a press clip. Press clips are edited. The press is your enemy! This guy was a board member of the NRA. When he saw the clip he was amazed. He apoligized profusely. This video cost the gun world tons of money that would have helped your cause. Who do you think was behind it? This man would not have intentionally hurt the cause. Do not give the anti-gun people a bullet for their gun. Believing this clip verbatium will. Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawMan=Corporation (Post 1424814) I Posted that video on another board and received a NEG Rep point for it. My comment that accompanied the video link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSGySNLyACE Better version of it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE-r531Bs-I

Twisted Avatar | 11-20-2008 05:20 AM
Re: Assault Weapons Ban II Quote:
Originally Posted by cugir321 (Post 1425524) I talked to a regional NRA Rep about this video. There's more to this story then what you see on the utube video. 99.9% of the NRA members believe high cap mags are part of the second amendment. Remember this is a press clip. Press clips are edited. The press is your enemy! This guy was a board member of the NRA. When he saw the clip he was amazed. He apoligized profusely. This video cost the gun world tons of money that would have helped your cause. Who do you think was behind it? This man would not have intentionally hurt the cause. Do not give the anti-gun people a bullet for their gun. Believing this clip verbatium will.
That video didnt look doctored me....... and at no point did he recant. I would like to see the whole interview if someone has it, T

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
Page 2 of 2 | < | 1 | 2
Show 30 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM