Gold & Silver Forum (http://goldismoney.info/forums/index.php)
- Firearms (http://goldismoney.info/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159)
- - What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... (http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=389524)

Gaillo | 07-08-2009 09:47 PM
What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Hi - found this on another website, wondering what you all think of this guys arguments. He seems to make a convincing case for the 9mm cartridge Quote:
I'm a 9-a-holic. 9mm Luger, to be specific! Like many love stories, this one starts out with more than a little bit of suspicion, distrust, and even a bit of outright hate. You see, I (like most of you on this forum) was brought up in America, where bigger = better for most things. One of my fondest childhood memories was of shooting my grandfather's 600 Nitro Express elephant gun, and having it knock me completely off my feet and putting my ass in the dirt. While I never did ask him to fire that gun again, I did take an instant liking to anything he or my stepfather took to the range that made a BIG bang! By the time I was 10, I had fired pretty much every cartridge that had .45 in the title... and loved it all! But I digress. When I was much older, and in an adequate financial situation to begin purchasing my own stable of guns, I focused almost exclusively on .45ACP and .40S&W. I threw in a sprinkling of 10mm guns, a few .357 Sigs, and a .357 Magnum revolver just because I liked the sound of the cartridge name! Anything smaller than 10mm just didn't seem "right" to me somehow, and the lowest of the low (in my then ignorant opinion) was the "puny" 9mm. The time was right for an intellectual spanking, and I got the treatment I richly deserved from an ex-marine friend who I unfortunately mouthed off to one afternoon. The conversation went something like this: Me - I noticed you have quite a few boxes of 9mm ammo on the shelf. Do you pick them up at the range and store your .45 reloads in them *wink wink*? Him - Hell no! They're full of 9mm ammo. Me - Someone gave you a free gun, eh? I can't imagine a man like you actually spending hard-earned cash on such a puny weapon! *wink wink* Him - (something to the effect of) You don't know shit, boy - come back and we'll have this conversation after you learn a thing or two about weapons, and that cartridge! Well, after this thorough bitchslapping, I actually did as he suggested, and learned a thing or two about the 9mm Luger and the guns chambered for it. I compiled, printed out, and studied online information regarding "stopping power", penetration, bullet style vs. effectiveness, etc. and comparisons of the 9mm to other cartridges. What I learned gave me an entirely new respect for the once (in my mind) maligned cartridge, and the more I learned, the more I wanted to own a few 9mm's of my own! Fast forward. Many years later, after much gun buying, trying, selling, rinse, lather, repeat... the ONLY centerfire handguns I own are chambered in 9mm Luger. My former love affairs with all things 10mm and .45 is over - and I don't miss them a bit. Now, I'm not saying that this is a situation that anyone else should aspire to, for many people variety is the spice of life and some only get off on the big bores. I'm just saying that for me, with my preferences and style of shooting, the 9mm-only situation just plain works for me. I've gone through a lot of different guns in my life, most of which are history at this point - long since traded or sold. Of all the guns I've had the pleasure (and sometimes displeasure) of shooting, the ones that I enjoyed the most were almost invariably chambered for 9mm Luger. The only gun I've never been able to obtain that I would call a "dream gun" (the Sig P210) is also chambered for this cartridge - so I still have unfulfilled 9mm aspirations to look forward to! Here are a few things that I think the 9mm Luger has going for it: * Low Cost Ammo (as compared to the larger bore cartridges) * High magazine capacity * Light weight for the same qty. of cartridges as compared to the big bores * Smaller bulk for the same qty. of cartridges as compared to the big bores * Tapered case design for better feeding - most larger cartridges are straight-walled * GIGANTIC selection of cartridge types, with a HUGE variety of bullet weights and styles * Many FANTASTIC quality, excellently made handguns chambered for 9mm Luger * Superb availability of ammo, at least until very recently! Even with the recent ammo shortage, you can still find 9mm fairly easily if you know where to look. * Generally low recoil for faster followup shots * You almost NEVER hear about "KB!" problems with 9mm handguns * Lower cartridge pressures mean that a more compact, lightweight handgun can be designed for 9mm * Almost identical "stopping power" ratings to .40 and .45, within a few percent. Given, "stopping power" ratings are highly controvercial (and I personally don't put much stock in them anyway) - but few would argue that the 9mm DOES have the ability to stop an attacker with properly placed shots - and do it VERY well indeed! A few interesting tidbits of information about the 9mm Luger: * The 9mm Luger was developed in Germany as a military pistol cartridge * The 9mm Luger was created in 1902, making it older than the .45ACP - which arrived 2 years later * The 9mm Luger remains the most popular and commonly encountered handgun cartridge in the world outside of the United States * As far as I know, there is no other cartridge with as many proper and accepted names. These include: 9mm Luger (The "official" name for the cartridge) 9mm Parabellum 9x19 9x19mm 9mm 9mm NATO 9x19mm NATO I have several spent cartridge casings with many of the above names on them, and one casing that is stamped simply "9"! Several years ago, I bought some that was stamped "9mm Luger Para" around the face, although I didn't keep an empty for my collection unfortunately. An interesting side note for .357 Sig enthusiasts: The Border Patrol, Federal Air Marshals and United States Secret Service favored and used 115 grain +P+ 9mm loads at 1,300 ft/s for years with excellent results. When the Secret Service and Federal Air Martials replaced the 9mm with the .357 Sig, they chose a 125 grain projectile at 1,350 ft/s. Seems hardly worth the effort of going to the newer, larger cartridge and guns for a measly gain of 50 ft/s and 10 grains, don't you think? Anyway - not writing this to badmouth other cartridges - just wanted to express my appreciation and some of the knowledge I've gathered about the 9mm. I often tell people that "I'm ALL about the 9", and somewhat enjoy the dubious looks on their faces or the outright criticisms like "what... you have something against stopping power?" or other such nonsense. I just grin a bit and secretly gloat a little about my hidden joy, knowing that it performs within a hairs width as well as their super-blasters under real-world conditions, in guns that I really ENJOY shooting and working on - with low-recoil, fast followup double-triple tapping fun! The 9 is just fine - at least for me!

SilverCity | 07-08-2009 10:00 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Gabe Suarez also makes the case for 9mm...sorry I can't remember the source. From Gabe Suarez: Magazine Capacity An Asset In A Gunfight I suppose this will be yet another highly controversial issue, but what the heck. Controversy makes for interesting discussion, no? The issue is to look at whether high magazine capacity gives you a tactical advantage, or if we are better served by carrying an equally sized weapon with a smaller capacity of bigger bullets. Before I answer my own question, let me put forth some facts as seen both in force on force training and on the street. Point One - Pistol bullets, regardless of caliber are all, what one colleague calls, "iffy". None can be guaranteed to drop an adversary in his tracks reliably. The notion of a one shot stop is an urban myth dreamed up by those with a vested interest in such things. I have seen 45s work and fail, and I have seen 9mm both work and fail. For the record, the only one shot drop (excluding head shots) I have ever seen with a pistol was fired by a good friend as we entered a crack house during a SWAT raid. He shot the bad guy squarely in the heart with 9mm +P+ out of a SIG P-226. He only fired once because the bad guy fell before my friend could reset his trigger for the next shot! If we look at the three most prevalent calibers we see that there is very little difference between them. A 9mm (also .38/.357) is only one little millimeter smaller than the 10mm (aka .40 S&W), and that is only one little millimeter less than the vaunted 11mm (aka .45 ACP). And before we get into the high speed light bullet versus the heavy slow bullet argument, lets remember that you can only drive a pistol bullet so fast without drastically affecting its integrity. Moreover, since penetration is affected by weight, sacrificing weight for speed will not yield good results. Finally, you can only make a bullet so light or so heavy. There are limits to what you can shoot out of a pistol. I have seen every one of these calibers fail at one time or another. There are those who disdain the 9mm as unsuitable for anything larger than squirrels. With modern ammunition, this is simply not true. There is also a myth and a cult grown up around the .45 ACP in this country. Sadly, it is not the deadly hammer of god its proponents suggest. This is not new. Read Fairbairn's Shoot To Live. He writes of two separate times when the .45 failed to work any better than anything else. Although one millimeter may give you a slight edge in a less than optimum body hit, under most circumstances, there will be very little difference between the effectiveness of the various calibers when modern anti-personnel ammo is used. Trauma injury doctors and reputable terminal ballistics experts tend to agree with this statement. Point Two - Private Citizen CCW Operators do not go looking for trouble. If they are called to fight it is either because they have inadvertently crossed paths with bad guys while they are doing bad guy stuff (walking in on a robbery in progress as an example), or because they have been specifically targeted and stalked (such as a carjack, or home invasion event). They will have to use extreme violence to fight off the surprise attackers. When we translate the conversion of fright and startle into a firearm application we wee that definition is high volume of fire. You will shoot a lot, and until the threat is no longer there. While these events share slightly different dynamics, the common thread often seen is that of multiple adversaries. The lone criminal or terrorist is an urban myth. If your fight only involves one, consider yourself lucky. More often than not you will be outnumbered. Another point is the time frames in which these events take place. Think three seconds. After this, either you will be dead, or your adversaries will be dead. Urban gunfights do not go for hours. Unexpected, short duration, high intensity, extreme violence, multiple adversaries. That is the back drop. Point Three - Our staff has collectively been in a large number of gunfights ranging from police, citizen, and military events. We draw on those experiences to set up mock gunfights in dynamic, unscripted force on force training drills. Although the surprise factor is missing (you generally don t know you will be in a gunfight until it is upon you), the dynamics of its evolution do not change much. Here are some other observations from watching hundreds of those drills. 1). Defenders will fire their weapons until the threat disappears. That means that until the role player falls down (simulating effective hits delivered), or runs away (removing the target), the good guy will keep firing. The concept of school solutions, controlled pairs, or otherwise artificially limiting the number of shots (as one does in a firing string on the range) does not hold up even in guys who've been extensively trained to do it. 2). When a training gun stops firing (due to running out of pellets), the shooter is still in the fight and still trying to shoot his enemy as well as trying to not be hit by him. We see them continue to try to work the trigger for one or two times before there is a realization that there has been a stoppage (malfunction or empty gun). This is followed by a visual examination of the gun, and only then is remedial action taken. This can take upwards f a second and a half before anything is even attempted to fix the gun, and then the additional time needed to reload. Thus the idea that one can read the gun s feel and immediately realize a need to speed load simply does not hold up. Running out of ammo is usually a fight ender if there has been a failure to stop, or there are multiple adversaries at hand. 3). Participants in these reactive mock gunfights are debriefed immediately to get a clear picture of what happened before any rationalization takes place. Besides a shoot them to the ground firing process, most shooters do not remember seeing the crystal clear sight pictures they learned on the shooting range. We see a great deal of point shooting, and gun index shooting. I have yet to see anyone strike a classic shooting posture and press off a carefully sighted pair in these room distance drills. The point to remember is that in a fight such as what are likely for the private citizen, one can easily develop Bullet Deficit Disorder , and that this can have deleterious effects on the outcome of that fight. The idea that a pair or trio of quality rounds carefully delivered onto a high scoring target zone will stop the action fails both the terminal ballistics test as well as the applications test. A truth of gunfighting - Having more ammo immediately on board lessens the likelihood of ever needing to reload. Not needing to reload translates into more time delivering lead and less time manipulating the weapon. More trigger time increases likelihood of hitting, which increases survivability. So the question is this. Given that there is a limit to the size pistol one can carry, do I want that pistol to hold more rounds? My answer is a strong YES! Consider the similarly sized Glock 36 in .45 ACP, and the Glock 23 in .40 S&W. The latter holds nearly twice the ammo of the former in an almost identical package. The Glock 19 is an even more drastic comparison with 15 shots available. Of course there are also high capacity 45 pistols for those so inclined and for those who can wield them. I would argue that if your choice is a 45, a gun holding 13 would be better than a gun holding 6. And if your hand is too small for the 13 shooter, rather than decrease capacity, I d decrease caliber. I have a colleague is South America who has been in High Risk Police Service for close to three decades. He has been in over three dozen verified gunfight . His weapon was originally a Browning Hi-Power and later a Glock 17. I was very interested in hearing more so I asked him about the load he used. He said he had always used military ball full metal jacket. Astounded I asked him why he chose that. That is all we can get here. Hollow points are illegal . I shook my head and told him that there was a belief in the USA that 9mm was an anemic caliber, especially in the load he d chosen. He shrugged and said that his adversaries must not have gotten the word. He said he fired a burst at the chest and if they didn't fall fast enough, he fired a burst at the face. He never needed to reload and had enough on board so if he missed a shot or two he could catch up in the fight. And before we hear the careful shooter versus the spraying prayer, this man is one of the best shots I have seen and competes on an international level. Even so, he knows the chaos in a gunfight can play havoc with even the most gifted marksman. Perhaps we need to take a lesson from him. Me? I split the difference and carry a Glock 23 in .40 S&W. But I feel just as comfortable with a 15 shot 9mm. While on the subject of Calibers In variably one of the things asked by a prospective gunman, right after he decides which type of pistol to buy and carry, is what caliber should he get. In fact, you would be hard pressed to pick up any gun-related magazine and not see at least one article relating to ammunition and caliber choices. Some instructors are also very caliber-focused, thinking that anyone who does not bring a 45 to class is unarmed. One student of mine who carries a 9mm was recently told that his 9mm was simply a 45 set on �stun�. (The commentator however, declined to be stunned.). So what should you do when trying to decide on calibers/loads, etc.? In a previous article we discussed the attribute of magazine capacity. Here we will discuss the characteristics of each caliber and give you some information so you can make up your own mind. Issue Number One � Shootability. I had a student come to class with a Glock 29 in 10mm. My philosophy is that students should bring whatever they want to carry, and that was his choice. The only problem was this gent weighed about 125 pounds, and was arthritic in both wrists. To make matters worse, he�d bought 500 rounds of the heaviest most powerful T-Rex stopping loads he could find in the caliber. To make a long story short, he ended up shooting the rest of the class with my Glock 17. That caliber/weapon combination may have made a fine choice for a larger and stronger man, but for him it was totally unusable. The caliber choice must be first predicated on the reality of your physical condition. Can you shoot the thing? Can you train with it? If you wince in pain every time you fire that Dino-killer in training, you will never be able to use it well in a fight. Be honest with your self. Let your intellect and not your ego select your caliber. Issue Number Two � Delivery Envelope. Some students in my classes live and work in certain social circles where the pistol must not only be concealed, it must be covert. This means that weapon selection is as important as anything else. For them, an HK USP may be a fine weapon, but they will never carry it. Selecting a smaller weapon that will always be there may be a better choice. There are small, large caliber weapons out there, but remember Issue Number One � how shootable is it for you. My friend with the super-charged Glock 29 was trying unsuccessfully to kill both issues with one choice. If you must carry a smaller weapon, and shootability issues are present, do not feel impotent because you had to decrease caliber size. Issue Number Three � Availability. By now we are entering the Hurricane season again and the memory of Katrina lies lightly on the minds of those who live in the Southeast. Natural disasters and riots can occur at any time. We are assuming that you will have your CCW pistol as a first line of defense until you can obtain something else. In the event you cannot get to your survival stash, you may need to resupply from regular sources. If you carry a .357 SIG, or a 45 GAP, or any other new, non-mainstream caliber, do you think you will find the ammo you need? When I travel, I carry a Glock 17 in 9mm. Why? Because if my ammo does not arrive with my luggage (the illusion of security), I can always find 9mm. Perhaps not a huge issue but still something for consideration. Issue Number Four � Effects On Target This is where all the bullet salesmen come out and discuss amateur terminal ballistics. Listen folks � hundreds of thousands of people, both good guys and bad guys, have been killed with pistol shots in the last few decades. I will bet the majority of those have been shot with 9mm. Why do I say that? Because I travel all over the world to teach good guys how to prevail in gunfights and invariably the caliber of availability is 9mm. �How on earth do they get past the fact that the 9mm is anemic and will bounce off a leather jacket?�, someone may ask. Truth be told, they shoot the bad guys until they either fall down or run away. Usually it is the former. Its only here in the USA that we are so fixated on this issue of one or two shots. We may hear all manner of arguments about the one caliber or another being the only true choice, but I will tell you that no single caliber will be the best choice for everyone. Heck, some people are better served with a caliber like 22 LR due to physical limits from advanced age or injury! All calibers can fail, and have failed. When you look at the issues scientifically a 9mm or a .38 Special is approximately .357. A 40 S&W is 10mm. And a 45 ACP is 11mm. So could it be that we have basically one or two little millimeters separating �T-Rex Stopper� from �Merely Adequate�, or �Anemically Inadequate�? Yes that is exactly right. Let me put it in a different perspective. A student of mine who works for a narcotics Unit in the south recently reported in. He told me that he and his guys had gotten in a gunfight with a violent drug dealer. Our student shot the bad guy once with a shotgun loaded with Federal Tactical Slugs. (Slugs incidentally are about .72 caliber and are suggested as anti-bear insurance in Alaska ). The shotgun slug entered the right side of the bad guy�s chest from about the 2:00 and exited through the back at about the 8:00 . Nice shot. However, the bad guy not only kept fighting, but stole a car and evaded the pursuing police officers into a wooded area. A week later, the bad guy�s attorney arranged for him to turn himself in. He was alive and well, albeit injured. Does anyone want to tell me how deadly their pistol round is now? So select the size of your pistol first and foremost. Base it on what you need to carry it 24-7-365. That means all the time. Select a caliber that is easily obtained, and shootable for you. And finally, train to hit and keep hitting until the threat has gone away (one way or the other). A hit with a 9mm is far better than a marginal hit or a miss with a caliber you cannot control.

Iptuous | 07-08-2009 10:01 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... 9mm doesn't start with a '4'.... nobody was ever killed by anything that doesn't start with '4'.... ask wallew... (but don't open any attachments in his msgs...you could get fired. :ok:)

Heimdhal | 07-08-2009 10:02 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Ah geez, get ready for the soon to commence war! lol. I REALLY, REALLY like my .45's. I like the slow, heavy and fat. But that doesnt mean I dont have any love for the fast and light either. 9mm's have taken out plenty of people. I hate that old "well, the 9mm is an older military round than the .45 acp." I dont know why 9 lovers always have to bring that up. But, whatever. Both have proven themselves time and again on battlefields all over the world. With ammunition manufactured the way it is today(good, consitant expansion hollow points etc) a 9 with good SD ammo is nothing to frown at. But, and this is just my opinion, a .45 seems a bit less picky about whether you have GOOD SD rounds, or good old fashioned FMJ Ball. I will say though, the ammo capacity of the 9's are nice. Im not as big a fan of the .40 as I am a 9 or .45, but I have hands that cant always fit a high cap .45 properly.

EE_ | 07-08-2009 10:11 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Yeah, I'm an idiot too. I like high capacity 9's that allow me faster follow-up shots, and more practice with less cost. Golden Saber +P 124 Gr. is my preferred ammo

illuminate10 | 07-08-2009 10:46 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... I would've went with a hi-cap 9mm (maybe) but, in Cali you are limited to 10 rounds in any caliber so......I grabbed the 45 that I can shoot well.

C&L 1911 | 07-08-2009 11:15 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by Iptuous (Post 1808105) 9mm doesn't start with a '4'.... nobody was ever killed by anything that doesn't start with '4'.... ask wallew...
You forgot to add one more thing; the 7.62x25, even though it doesn't start with a "4" (heck, it barely makes it over "3") is the best round ever developed and the only round that could stop Chuck Norris. :wink:

Heimdhal | 07-08-2009 11:16 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by C&L 1911 (Post 1808207) You forgot to add one more thing; the 7.62x25, even though it doesn't start with a "4" (heck, it barely makes it over "3") is the best round ever developed and the only round that could stop Chuck Norris. :wink:
Correction: Its the only round Chuck Norris would ALLOW him to be stopped by...if Chuck Norris could ever be stopped. By anything. Ever.

electric-amish | 07-08-2009 11:58 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... 9mm changed the landscape in the 80s. Moved the entire Nations Police force to Semi-Auto high capacity hand guns. 9s will work just fine. But my social work tools start with a 4. Its my opinion that by the time I have to make noise it has to be a final step--not one of many. However I have a secret love affair with snubs in 38 cal. I just can't help it. E-A

EE_ | 07-09-2009 12:14 AM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by electric-amish (Post 1808267) 9mm changed the landscape in the 80s. Moved the entire Nations Police force to Semi-Auto high capacity hand guns. 9s will work just fine. But my social work tools start with a 4. Its my opinion that by the time I have to make noise it has to be a final step--not one of many. What if it's not one, but many? http://i721.photobucket.com/albums/w...lEE/gang-1.jpg However I have a secret love affair with snubs in 38 cal. I just can't help it. Love my old model 60! E-A
.................

illuminate10 | 07-09-2009 04:23 AM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by Heimdhal (Post 1808212) Correction: Its the only round Chuck Norris would ALLOW him to be stopped by...if Chuck Norris could ever be stopped. By anything. Ever.
Haha, Chuck is a badass but.......Return of the Dragon? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtZNvK3fTlM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtZNvK3fTlM
Check the stance, chalk another one for the 10%'ers. (lefty's):yes:

ThomasJ1776 | 07-09-2009 10:22 AM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... I like my my 9s, just learning and adjusting to my 1911 .45 now, and am thinking about an XD or something in .40. The guy at my range loooooves the .40, compromise between size and capacity as well as recoil, but also mentions its huge penetration capability. Does anyone have any real evidence to back up that it is has better penetration values of objects, like windshields, car doors etc...? Just trying to think aside from everyday carry if it were a civil unrest/riot situation, and needed more than something quick and point blank.

BobtheTomato | 07-09-2009 11:08 AM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... two words.....shot placement

tulsamal | 07-09-2009 01:02 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
When the Secret Service and Federal Air Martials replaced the 9mm with the .357 Sig, they chose a 125 grain projectile at 1,350 ft/s. Seems hardly worth the effort of going to the newer, larger cartridge and guns for a measly gain of 50 ft/s and 10 grains, don't you think?
The .357 SIG was designed to match the standard .357 Magnum cop load out of a four inch revolver. That's _1450 fps_. I get that velocity or higher out of my guns. But I'm using a 5.1" barrel. It doesn't make any sense to put that round in super short barrels. As far as the direct comparison, I carry Winchester Ranger SXT 9mm +P+ in my P7M8. For exactly the reason that it gets 9mm as close to .357 SIG as possible. But that doesn't mean there is no reason for .357 SIG. Especially as a duty round. +P+ is hard on the gun. Everything wears out faster. You are pushing the round well past the published max levels. Not really fair to compare an overload with a standard velocity load. I've always wondered why somebody doesn't publish specs for .357 SIG +P but it doesn't exist at this point. Anyway, if you were an LEO department and you had to maintain hundreds of guns over years, you would be much happier over the long term with .375 SIG than with 9mm +P+. Are you going to have your officers practice and qualify with ammo that is underloaded compared to their duty round? Otherwise they will need repairs on their guns much more often. But it isn't really a good idea for them to practice with lighter loads! Or you could just give them .357 SIG guns and they could use the same loads all the time. As a person who fires both rounds a lot, you only need to fire one or two mags to realize that 9mm will never "be equal" to .357 SIG. It is a highly specialized one trick pony of a cartridge but what it does, it does well. High velocity and energy. Flat trajectory. Perfectly satifactory accuracy. Excellent hard penetration. Excellent vest penetration. My normal carry gun is a .44 Special. Then the P7M8 with +P+ loads. But my 24 hour bug out bag has the Glock 35 with .357 SIG barrel inside. With 10 loaded mags. Flexibility and power to do nearly anything I want to do with a handgun. Gregg

Shasta Gold | 07-09-2009 01:03 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... 9mm will do the job...and well. If one "needs" something bigger, you don't go to something that starts with a 4...you go to something numbered 12.

tulsamal | 07-09-2009 01:08 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... The main fact you need to know about 9mm is that what we have today "isn't your father's 9mm." I wasn't confident in 9mm in a carry gun in the 1970's and 1980's. That's the reason I never bought a P7 when they came out. But the ammo companies and bullet makers came through for us. The bullets in premium self defense ammo today is so good that it essentially "moves you up one caliber" in capabilities. A 9mm with premium top of the line JHP's today is absolutely capable of doing the job of self defense with any reasonable bullet placement. They expand reliably. They penetrate deeply. I tell people trying to find a CCW gun to pick the gun first. Once you settle on a design you like, then pick the caliber. If the gun you like only comes in 9mm, that's good enough. If you can get the exact same gun in .40 S&W, it is your choice. Honestly.... I don't think it matters with the best ammo out there. And the 9mm might hold a couple more rounds and be quicker to fire the second shot. Your choice but there is nothing wrong with 9mm today. Just don't buy one and then carry it loaded with American Eagle FMJ's! Gregg

Willie Peter | 07-09-2009 01:24 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by Heimdhal (Post 1808212) Correction: Its the only round Chuck Norris would ALLOW him to be stopped by...if Chuck Norris could ever be stopped. By anything. Ever.
Don't mess with Chuck....bad to the bone http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/924...iseyedrops.jpg

St. Germain | 07-09-2009 02:13 PM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by BobtheTomato (Post 1808752) two words.....shot placement
Agreed. But everyone (excluding Chuck Norris) is susceptible to an adrenaline dump. I have had it happen on many occasions - it is an issue of management and training. I prefer the larger payload as it may give me an edge. ST

AG Capone | 07-13-2009 12:38 AM
Re: What do you all think of this? Re: 9mm Luger... Quote:
Originally Posted by tulsamal (Post 1808927) As a person who fires both rounds a lot, you only need to fire one or two mags to realize that 9mm will never "be equal" to .357 SIG. It is a highly specialized one trick pony of a cartridge but what it does, it does well. High velocity and energy.
I shot a Sig 226 in 357 sig over July 4th. The muzzle was jumping all over the place. Yes, my 9mm will never be as equal, but I'll be able to out shoot a guy fighting 357 Sig recoil.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM. |

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM